You Are Not In Good Hands With Allstate

Brent Adams
Attorney
(866) 735-1102 Ext 645
Posted by Brent AdamsMay 18, 2008 9:14 AM
Tags: None

We have all heard the Allstate Insurance Company slogan which is: “You are in good hands with Allstate”.

Those of us who fight Allstate Insurance Company on a regular basis and our clients who seek adequate awards from Allstate Insurance Company know that an experience with Allstate Insurance Company is anything but “good”.

Throughout an 18-month investigation into minor impact-soft-Tissue injury collisions CNN found that if a person were injured in a minor accident, chances were high that Allstate would “challenge your medical claim, offering you barely a fraction of your expenses.”

One of Allstate’s former lawyers admitted that Allstate’s strategy is to make fighting the company “so expensive and so time-consuming that lawyers would start refusing to help clients.”

During the early ‘90s Allstate Insurance Company hired management consultant giant McKinsey & Co. to help Allstate increase its profits.

McKinsey & Co. came up with a scheme that significantly increased Allstate’s profits by means of shortchanging claimants who sought inadequate recovery from injuries sustained in minor motor vehicle collisions.

At the direction of McKinsey & Co. Allstate installed a new claims handling system called Claims Core Process Design (CCPD). This system was put into place in 1995.

The major emphasis of CCPD was to pay less on claims by using rigid standardized methods such as Fast Track, Colossus, minor impact-soft tissue referrals and special investigative unit referrals and by discouraging legal representation.

By the use of Colossus, Allstate took away from the in-the-field claims adjusters the discretion to set the value of a claim. I instead, the facts arising out of the claim were fed into a computer program named Colossus. Colossus spit out the value of the claim in a cookbook fashion. This is the amount that Allstate stuck to in its negotiations with injured claimants.

Because litigation is expensive, Allstate knew that by making low ball offers to the claimants chances were good that these beaten down claimants would settle their claim for a small fraction of its true value. These hard-pressed claimants simply did not have the wherewithal and stamina to fight their claims in court.

Unfortunately, Allstate tactics of discouraging attorneys to help injured victims in these low impact cases proved to be very profitable. Sadly, many lawyers who were willing to take minor impact cases before the new McKinsey procedures were instituted now refuse to help these injured parties because Allstate made it too expensive for these lawyers to handle the cases. These lawyers found that the chances of their making any profit on these cases were so slim that they refused to handle the cases.

Fortunately, there are dedicated plaintiffs lawyers who are willing to take these cases.

However, these scorch-the-earth defense tactics employed by not only Allstate Insurance Company but State Farm, Nationwide and many other insurance companies, have taken their toll on the unfortunate personal injury victims who now find it even more difficult to obtain an adequate recovery for their injuries.


4 Comments

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

AB
Posted by AB
May 19, 2008 5:14 AM

I agree with everything in this article, and wish this would become a national issue. We have a spinal cord / brain injury case for attendant care against allstate that's been running the court system since 2001.

EW
Posted by EW
May 19, 2008 11:20 AM

Well, this certainly is a fairly one-sided take on things. While I agree that there shouldn't be a "cookbook" type of approach to claim handling, the fact of the matter is that many lawyers pursue just that type of approach. Specifically, the old "3 times bills" method to arrive at a value for a claim. So, on the one hand lawyers are chiding Insurance carriers for coming up with a system that uses a set valuation approach while on the other hand they are pursuing their own set valuation approach. The problem that lawyers have is that the Insurance approach pays less than their approach. If that weren't the case, we'd never hear about "cookbook" types of claim handling.

The problem is this: The proliiferation of legal activity surrounding auto/property claims has led many people to wrongly believe that they've hit the lottery when they are involved in the accident. This mindset was started, and has been perpetuated, by Injury Attorneys over the past 2 decades or so. Everywhere you turn there is some ambulance chaser telling you how much money you are entitled to get if you were in an accident. Rarely, if ever, is the the focus of the commercial on the person's actual physical well-being. Rather, it's all about the $$$. People in turn think that they've hit the lottery and when they finally do talk to the Insurance company they're often in for a rude surprise. False expectations lead to acrimoney which leads to more litigious activity, which invariably just serves to perpetuate this cycle. All to the benefit of the Injury Attorneys. Which is exactly what they want.

Move auto/property insurance from the private sector to the public sector and set forth laws limiting litigious activity. Only when there is no profit incentive - on either the part of the Insurance companies or the Injury Attorneys or the Chiropractors - will there be some measure of sanity in this process. Until then everyone will be out to line their own pockets at the expense of you and me (the drivers).

John Bonay
Posted by John Bonay
May 22, 2008 8:04 PM

I believe Allstate has a right to settle claims quickly and prompty. Insurance is not for getting rich just to get you back where you were before the problem. Most people that use an attorney to settle a claim end up getting a split of the winnings say 60% and after the attorney takes out his/her fees they may end up with a big chunk of the 60%. It is really funny this country is all about tearing down big companies what about all of the crooked attorneys, doctors, chiropractors. I think a crooked doctor, attorney, and chiropractors punishment should be the death penalty since articles like this are about killing off good American Companies.

AJ
Posted by AJ
May 22, 2008 8:09 PM

America is in trouble. Trial attorneys have taken over this country. Take for example Bruce Almighty the governor of FL. He says yes to every interest group. If you asked him if you could win the lottery he would sign the bill. I cant wait until John McCain picks him to be VP so he can leave Florida with a Trial Attorney as the new governor. They will succeed in ruining a great state and Bruce Almighty will finish of America.

Comments for this article are closed.

Subscribe to InjuryBoard Raleigh

InjuryBoard Raleigh RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

Injury Board Raleigh is brought to you by Brent Adams and Associates

Legal Assistance Center

More Info
Brent Adams and Associates (866) 735-1102 Ext 645 www.brentadams.com
google
Personal Injury Lawyers Serving: Raleigh, Durham,Apex, Fayetteville, Dunn, Cary, Chapel Hill, Henderson, Oxford, Research Triangle, Roxboro, Sanford, Smithfield, Warrenton, Clinton, Elizabethtown, Fort Bragg, Hamlet, Hope Mills, Lillington, Lumberton, Pinehurst, Rockingham, Southern Pines
2920 Highwoods BlvdSuite 125, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 [ Show Map ]
Better Business Bureau Accredited Business Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Looking for an InjuryBoard attorney closer to home? Click here.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address